How the Potter v Canada Square ruling affects you?

Last week, the Court of Appeal threw out an appeal by a bank to overturn a payment protection insurance (PPI) refund because the claim was lodged more than six years after the loan was repaid in the Potter v Canada Square ruling. This has a dramatic affect for current and potential investors in consumer litigation. Kevin Prior, founding partner of Ignite Invest, and Richard Law, Legal Director at Case to Answer, explain why in this timely, informal interview here.

If you are inspired by this ruling to find out more about our current and bestselling opportunity Invest in Cases with Fuse Legal, find out more here or call us on +44 203 355 1178

Privacy Preferences
When you visit our website, it may store information through your browser from specific services, usually in form of cookies. Here you can change your privacy preferences. Please note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our website and the services we offer.